Members of Parliament Freedom of Speech and King's Inviolability as Exclusion Grounds from Criminal Liability

Authors

  • Clara Viana Ballester Lecturer of Criminal Law, Universitat de València

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36151/td.2021.022

Keywords:

Privileges, prerogatives and immunities, personal-functional guarantees, members of Parliament freedom of speech, king's inviolability, Monarchy, immunity from jurisdiction in domestic law, exclusion grounds from criminal liability

Abstract

Few institutions have been so studied and questioned, from Criminal Law and Constitutional Law, as the immunities vested in public offices holding the powers of the State. One of those immunities refers to the «inviolability», a personal-functional guarantee that prevents the procedure to be open, given its legal nature of immunity from jurisdiction in domestic law. With a general overview, which goes beyond its analysis as an exclusively criminal guarantee and abandons the sterile debate about its inclusion in the theory of crime, this article deals with the definition, effects and jurisprudential evolution of the scope of application of the two inviolabilities of our legal system that are currently under political and judicial discussion: parliamentary inviolability —freedom of speech— and the king’s inviolability, states in Articles 71.1 and 56.3 of the Spanish Constitution, respectively (DER2017/86336-R, MCIN/AIE/10.13039/501100011033/FEDER Una manera de hacer Europa).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2021-12-31

How to Cite

Viana Ballester, C. (2021). Members of Parliament Freedom of Speech and King’s Inviolability as Exclusion Grounds from Criminal Liability. Teoría & Derecho. Revista De Pensamiento jurídico, (31), 70–109. https://doi.org/10.36151/td.2021.022